Posts tagged as:

Jimmy Carter

More Obama Foreign Policy

by Nick on July 15, 2008

Posted By: Nick

 
Fascinating read over at The New Republic.  Eli Lake writes that Obama’s foreign policy is likely to shape up to be more like Reagan than Carter.  The article highlights the fact that Richard Clarke and Rand Beers are senior advisors to the Obama Campaign and are likely to hold important posts in an Obama administration.  It also notes that:

Last November at a foreign policy forum in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Obama said there may be “40,000 hard-core jihadists with whom we can’t negotiate.” He went on. “Our job is to incapacitate them, to kill them.” In that spirit, he famously announced that he would strike terrorist bases in Pakistan if President Pervez Musharraf ever refuses to move on actionable intelligence against Al Qaeda–a threat that earned him the chastisement of John McCain, among others.

While that situation drew heavy criticism from many directions (including the anti-war base), I firmly believe Obama was right.  There’s no excuse for not protecting American national security interests.  If that means Pakistan gets pissed off, well, so be it.  We can’t sit around and wait for the next terrorist attack just because the Pakistani government isn’t cooperating.

{ 2 comments }

But This Isn’t the Obama I Wanted!

by Nick on July 10, 2008

Posted By: Nick

 
Go read Gail Collins’ column today: The Audacity of Listening.  For all those folks that just LOVED Barack Obama in the primary and then have just been SHOCKED! by his recent actions, this might open their eyes.

I can’t say anything he has done has surprised me one bit.  As Collins points out, he’s always called for cooperation and compromise.  This is a reason I didn’t support him in the primaries.  I don’t want to cooperate with Republicans.  I want to beat them down and crush them beneath my heel.

Some people think it’d be nice to have a liberal purist be our next president, but in the real world such a person a) won’t win (Dennis Kucinich), and b) won’t be able to govern effectively (Jimmy Carter).  I’m not saying Barack should sell out on every issue, but let’s cut the guy some slack.  He never said he’d be the liberal purist that some of the lefties think he is/should be; and the most important thing is winning.  What good is a perfect candidate that loses?

{ 0 comments }