From the category archives:

The Media

Rachel Maddow is My Hero

by Nick on August 27, 2008

People who know me know that I tend to get very pissed off about the media advancing false arguments in the name of “fairness.”  This is the common practice of the 24 hour news networks to have someone on from both sides of an issue to fight it out on air.  The problem of course is that sometimes, one side is factually correct, and the other is not, and by giving both sides air time, the media lends legitimacy to an argument that is demonstrably false.

So in today’s Washington Post article about Rachel Maddow, I was quite happy to read this:

But she is determined to avoid the left-right pairings that sustain much of cable news.  ”It creates fake balance,” she says. “I’m sorry — we’re going to have a debate about whether or not the Earth is flat? It doesn’t make sense to have a debate about whether offshore drilling is going to bring down gas prices. You know what? It’s not. The fact that it’s false ought to be reported, or you’re advancing a lie.”

I can’t wait for her show to start!

{ 0 comments }

Has it Really Come to This?

by Nick on August 15, 2008

Apparently John McCain’s campaign is so crappy compared to Barack Obama’s that the media has resorted to finding obscure, tiny groups of people that favor McCain so that they can write a big article about them.  The Politico informs us that Sports Team Owners overwhelmingly favor John McCain; even the sport team owners in Chicago!

Sports team owners may not be John McCain’s answer to the Hollywood elite, but they’re overwhelmingly supporting his presidential campaign over Barack Obama’s.

Through the end of June, team owners in the four major sports and their families have given to or raised more than $3.2 million for McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, compared with only $615,000 for his Democratic rival Obama, according to a Politico analysis of data from the Federal Election Commission, the campaigns and interviews.

Is there really nothing better to write about?

{ 1 comment }

The “Barack Obama Should Be Farther Ahead” Meme

by Nick on August 6, 2008

The media loves to keep coming back to the idea that somehow Barack Obama is failing because he’s not way ahead in the polls.  Today’s example is The Politico’s front-page article titled Obama Stalls in Public Polling.  Yes, this is a close election.  But to suggest that Barack Obama is somehow a failed candidate because he has not pulled away is misleading and, frankly, incredibly biased.

While Obama still leads in most matchups with John McCain, the Illinois senator’s apparent stall in the polls is a sobering reminder to Democrats intoxicated with his campaign’s promises to expand the electoral map beyond the boundaries that have constrained other recent party nominees. 

That gap between expectations and reality comes as Democrats enjoy the most favorable political winds since at least 1976. At least eight in ten Americans believe the nation is on the wrong track. The Republican president is historically unpopular. From stunning Democratic gains in party registration to the high levels of economic anxiety, Obama should have a healthy lead by almost every measure. Yet, in poll after poll, Obama conspicuously fails to cross the 50 percent threshold. 

But there is a major problem with this analysis.  The most glaringly obvious problem is that Obama is leading and has been leading consistently for some time now.  Furthermore, McCain is losing, and has been for some time now, but there is not a plethora of articles about how McCain should be doing so much better than he is.

The other problem is with national polling both in terms of accuracy and as an indicator electoral outcomes.  Polling is not an exact science; in fact it can be incredibly imprecise and is dependent on what the individual pollster decides is the proper formula for weighting.  In an election year such as this, we should expect higher Democratic turnout than Republican turnout, which will tilt the party identification numbers (which are already in favor of Democrats) even further into the Democratic column.

Then there is the Electoral College.  Our president is not selected by the popular vote (as much as I might wish it was).  If you take a look at the electoral map, the picture is very different.  Here are some current electoral college projections from a few different websites:

Five Thirty Eight: Obama 297.8; McCain 240.2

Real Clear Politics: Obama 238; McCain 163; Toss Ups 137
Without Toss Ups: Obama 322; McCain 216

Pollster: Obama 284; McCain 157; Toss Ups 97

CNN: Obama 221; McCain 189; Toss Ups 128

One thing seems clear in those projections: Obama has a strong lead.  In terms of Electoral Votes, safe Obama states outnumber safe McCain states by anyone’s count.  Furthermore, there aren’t many states in the Obama column that have potential to flip to McCain.  On the other hand, Obama does have an outside shot at a few states (North Carolina, Montana, Georgia) that McCain should have no worries about.

The important thing here is to fight back against this meme.  Barack Obama is doing just fine, and will continue to stay in the lead until he wins the election.  National Polling may fluctuate, but it shows him with a consistent lead; furthermore, the electoral map favors Obama much more than McCain.

Maybe the next time a journalist decides to write one of these nonsense stories they will examine the facts first, and then write about how things don’t look good for John McCain.

{ 5 comments }

David Shuster is an Idiot

by Nick on August 4, 2008

I‘m watching MSNBC and David Shuster asks if Obama is just playing politics as usual because he’s attacking McCain on energy.

So, is Obama supposed to just do nothing?  He’s not allowed to point out the differences between himself and McCain?  Give me a break.  Obama calling out John McCain for McCain’s bullshit energy solutions (offshore drilling is a good example), is not Obama playing politics as usual.  It’s Obama telling the truth to voters and trying to take our country towards real energy independence.

{ 1 comment }

The Jesse Jackson Situation

by Nick on July 9, 2008

Posted By: Nick

 
So Jesse Jackson is apologizing because he apparently made some terrible remarks about Barack Obama.  So terrible that they can’t be repeated… anywhere.  So the media tells us he’s apologizing.  For what, they cannot say, but trust them, it was bad!

It’s this type of idiocy that has made people lose faith in the American media.  If the apology was worth reporting, then the thing being apologized for is worth reporting too.  Otherwise, it’s a non-story and time shouldn’t be wasted with it.

{ 0 comments }